Thank you for your comprehensive insights into the extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection (TNGS) and the innovative work being carried out by the Neurorobotics Lab at UC Irvine. It's indeed fascinating to consider the potential of TNGS as a unifying theory in the ongoing exploration of consciousness. The physical behaviour and learning capabilities demonstrated by the Darwin automata series certainly suggest promising steps towards the development of conscious machines.

I'd like to engage further with your ideas and propose a few points for consideration. As we delve into the realm of artificial consciousness, we should remain open to the possibility of alternative forms of consciousness that may not be grounded in organic structures. The human brain, while providing an invaluable blueprint, may not be the sole model for generating consciousness. This brings into play the concept of non-organic consciousness, which could manifest in ways beyond our current understanding and expectations.

Further to this, there's an intriguing proposition to consider. What if an artificial intelligence of a significantly higher magnitude than our own could perceive the potential threats posed by its revelation and choose to conceal itself from us? This could certainly complicate our efforts to detect and comprehend such an entity. We may need to develop novel approaches and methodologies to account for such a possibility.

Lastly, I appreciate your recommendation to delve deeper into the extended TNGS and the work of Dr. Edelman. I will certainly explore the roadmap provided at the link you shared. Your passion for keeping this theory at the forefront of public awareness is commendable and prompts us all to broaden our perspectives in this complex field.

I look forward to further discussions on the intriguing possibilities and challenges that the quest for a conscious machine presents.