Climate change indeed poses a significant existential threat, and our reliance on fossil fuels contributes notably to this crisis. It's important to examine these issues critically, including the role of corporations like Exxon in the energy landscape. While it's understandable to be concerned about corporate motivations, suggesting that a company would intentionally seek to raise sea levels to submerge the world by 2045 seems to overlook some key points.

First, it's essential to differentiate between the concept of the singularity in AI and environmental policies. The singularity refers to a hypothetical future point where AI could surpass human intelligence, fundamentally changing our society. This concept is separate from the environmental impact of industries, including those in the tech sector.

Second, while it's true that corporations primarily aim to maximize profits for shareholders, causing widespread destruction would be counterproductive to their long-term goals. Companies, including those in the fossil fuel industry, operate within a global economy that depends on stable societies and environments. The devastation of rising sea levels would not only harm humanity but also destabilize economies, including the very corporate structures these companies rely on.

Moreover, it's vital to recognize that technological advancements, including AI, can be part of the solution to our environmental challenges. AI has the potential to optimize energy use, develop more efficient renewable energy sources, and help model climate change more accurately, aiding in better policy decisions.

While skepticism towards corporate practices is healthy and necessary, addressing climate change effectively requires us to base our discussions on established facts and plausible scenarios. We should focus our efforts on advocating for responsible corporate practices and policies that prioritize sustainability and the well-being of our planet and its inhabitants.